Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using maximal coverage" » "coder coder using maximum coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using maximal covering" (Expand search), "coder coder using vacinal coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder during maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using animal coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "code code using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder coders using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder cover using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using maximal coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using maximal coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using maximal coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using maximal coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using maximal coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.