Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using low objects" » "coder decoder using low objects" (Expand search), "code code using low objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using low objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using low objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using low objects" (Expand search), "coder code using low objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using how objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using wow objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using new objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using low objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using low objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using low objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using low objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.