Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using loss processes" » "coder coder using loss process" (Expand search), "coder coder using less processed" (Expand search), "coder coder using tools processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using loss processes" (Expand search), "code code using loss processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using loss processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using loss processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using loss processes" (Expand search), "coder code using loss processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using floss processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using less processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using locus processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using loss processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using loss processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using loss processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using loss processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.