Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using loss object" » "coder decoder using loss object" (Expand search), "code code using loss object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using loss object" (Expand search), "coder coders using loss object" (Expand search), "coder cover using loss object" (Expand search), "coder code using loss object" (Expand search), "coder coder using lost object" (Expand search), "coder coder using lost objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using oops object" (Expand search), "coder coder using floss object" (Expand search), "coder coder using less object" (Expand search), "coder coder using locus object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using loss object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using loss object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using loss object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using loss object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.