Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using logit object" » "coder coder using lost object" (Expand search), "coder coder using logical object" (Expand search), "coder coder using lost objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using logit object" (Expand search), "code code using logit object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using logit object" (Expand search), "coder coders using logit object" (Expand search), "coder cover using logit object" (Expand search), "coder code using logit object" (Expand search), "coder coder using logic object" (Expand search), "coder coder using light object" (Expand search), "coder coder using log object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using logit object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using logit object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using logit object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using logit object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.