Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using log objects" » "coder decoder using log objects" (Expand search), "code code using log objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using log objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using log objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using log objects" (Expand search), "coder code using log objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using big objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using how objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using among objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using long objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using low objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using lhc objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using log objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using log objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using log objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using log objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.