Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using log code" » "coder decoder using log code" (Expand search), "code code using log code" (Expand search), "decoder codec using log code" (Expand search), "coder coders using log code" (Expand search), "coder cover using log code" (Expand search), "coder code using log code" (Expand search), "coder coder using long code" (Expand search), "coder coder using low code" (Expand search), "coder coder using lhc code" (Expand search), "coder coder using log model" (Expand search), "coder coder using log cores" (Expand search), "coder coder using g code" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using log code\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using log code ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using log code") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.