Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using locus programming" » "coder coder using block programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using robots programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder using locus programming" (Expand search), "code code using locus programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec using locus programming" (Expand search), "coder coders using locus programming" (Expand search), "coder cover using locus programming" (Expand search), "coder code using locus programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using focus programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using focused programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using locus programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using locus programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using locus programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using locus programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.