Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using lexical coverage" » "coder coder using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using local coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using political coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using medical coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using chemical coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder using clinical coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "code code using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder coders using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder cover using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using lexical coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using lexical coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using lexical coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using lexical coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.