Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using less object" » "coder decoder using less object" (Expand search), "code code using less object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using less object" (Expand search), "coder coders using less object" (Expand search), "coder cover using less object" (Expand search), "coder code using less object" (Expand search), "coder coder using nets object" (Expand search), "coder coder using endless object" (Expand search), "coder coder using press objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using least object" (Expand search), "coder coder using leaf object" (Expand search), "coder coder using lean object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using less object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using less object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using less object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using less object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.