Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using iterated process" » "coder coder using integrated process" (Expand search), "coder coder using literate process" (Expand search), "coder coder using iterative process" (Expand search), "coder coder using saturated process" (Expand search), "coder decoder using iterated process" (Expand search), "code code using iterated process" (Expand search), "decoder codec using iterated process" (Expand search), "coder coders using iterated process" (Expand search), "coder cover using iterated process" (Expand search), "coder code using iterated process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using iterated process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using iterated process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using iterated process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using iterated process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.