Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using independent processes" » "coder coder using independente processos" (Expand search), "coder coder using dependent processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using independente processo" (Expand search), "coder coder an independent processes" (Expand search), "coder coder and independent processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using independent processes" (Expand search), "code code using independent processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using independent processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using independent processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using independent processes" (Expand search), "coder code using independent processes" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using independent processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using independent processes\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using independent processes ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using independent processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.