Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using funerary objects" » "coder coder using funerary contexts" (Expand search), "coder coder using boundary objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using literary object" (Expand search), "coder coder using literary objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using funerary objects" (Expand search), "code code using funerary objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using funerary objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using funerary objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using funerary objects" (Expand search), "coder code using funerary objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using funerary objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using funerary objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using funerary objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using funerary objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.