Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using functionalized verification" » "coder coder using functional verification" (Expand search), "coder coder using functional diversification" (Expand search), "coder coder using functionalism reification" (Expand search), "coder coder on functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder coder acid functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder coder of functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder decoder using functionalized verification" (Expand search), "code code using functionalized verification" (Expand search), "decoder codec using functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder coders using functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder cover using functionalized verification" (Expand search), "coder code using functionalized verification" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using functionalized verification\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using functionalized verification ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using functionalized verification") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.