Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency program" » "coder coder using fluency program" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency diagram" (Expand search), "coder coder using reidency program" (Expand search), "coder coder single frequency program" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency program" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency program" (Expand search), "code code using frequency program" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency program" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency program" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency program" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency program" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using frequency program") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency program\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency program ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency program") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.