Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency modulated" » "coder coder using frequency modulation" (Expand search), "coder coder single frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder coder grazing frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency modulated" (Expand search), "code code using frequency modulated" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency modulated" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency modulated" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using frequency modulated") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency modulated\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency modulated ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency modulated") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.