Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency features" » "coder coder single frequency features" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency features" (Expand search), "coder coder grazing frequency features" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency features" (Expand search), "code code using frequency features" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency features" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency features" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency features" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency features" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using frequency features") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency features\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency features ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency features") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.