Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency embedding" » "coder coder using frequency encoding" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency spreading" (Expand search), "coder coder single frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder coder grazing frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency embedding" (Expand search), "code code using frequency embedding" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency embedding" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency embedding" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency embedding\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency embedding ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency embedding") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.