Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency data" » "coder coder single frequency data" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency data" (Expand search), "coder coder grazing frequency data" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency and" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency domain" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency data" (Expand search), "code code using frequency data" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency data" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency data" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency data" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency data" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency data\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency data ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency data") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.