Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using fft process" » "coder decoder using fft process" (Expand search), "code code using fft process" (Expand search), "decoder codec using fft process" (Expand search), "coder coders using fft process" (Expand search), "coder cover using fft process" (Expand search), "coder code using fft process" (Expand search), "coder coder using tft process" (Expand search), "coder coder using vft process" (Expand search), "coder coder using fast process" (Expand search), "coder coder using fe process" (Expand search), "coder coder using fem process" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using fft process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using fft process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using fft process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using fft process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.