Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using explicit promises" » "coder coder using implicit promises" (Expand search), "coder coder using implicit premises" (Expand search), "coder coder using explicit crisis" (Expand search), "coder coder ensino explicito promises" (Expand search), "coder decoder using explicit promises" (Expand search), "code code using explicit promises" (Expand search), "decoder codec using explicit promises" (Expand search), "coder coders using explicit promises" (Expand search), "coder cover using explicit promises" (Expand search), "coder code using explicit promises" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using explicit promises") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using explicit promises\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using explicit promises ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using explicit promises") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.