Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using executable process" » "coder coder using executive process" (Expand search), "coder coder using execution process" (Expand search), "coder coder using executable models" (Expand search), "coder coder using vegetable process" (Expand search), "coder coder using injectable process" (Expand search), "coder coder into executable process" (Expand search), "coder decoder using executable process" (Expand search), "code code using executable process" (Expand search), "decoder codec using executable process" (Expand search), "coder coders using executable process" (Expand search), "coder cover using executable process" (Expand search), "coder code using executable process" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using executable process") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using executable process\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using executable process ) OR ( api pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using executable process") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))*.