Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using defect prediction" » "coder coder using default prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder using defect detection" (Expand search), "coder coder using height prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder using defected prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder using direct prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder casting defect prediction" (Expand search), "coder decoder using defect prediction" (Expand search), "code code using defect prediction" (Expand search), "decoder codec using defect prediction" (Expand search), "coder coders using defect prediction" (Expand search), "coder cover using defect prediction" (Expand search), "coder code using defect prediction" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using defect prediction") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using defect prediction\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using defect prediction ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using defect prediction") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.