Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using coupled processes" » "coder coder using coupling processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using combined processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using controlled processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in coupled processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using coupled processes" (Expand search), "code code using coupled processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using coupled processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using coupled processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using coupled processes" (Expand search), "coder code using coupled processes" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using coupled processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using coupled processes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using coupled processes ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.