Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using cnn object" » "coder decoder using cnn object" (Expand search), "code code using cnn object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using cnn object" (Expand search), "coder coders using cnn object" (Expand search), "coder cover using cnn object" (Expand search), "coder code using cnn object" (Expand search), "coder coder using an object" (Expand search), "coder coder using en object" (Expand search), "coder coder using in object" (Expand search), "coder coder using cbn object" (Expand search), "coder coder using cfd object" (Expand search), "coder coder using c object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using cnn object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using cnn object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using cnn object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using cnn object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.