Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using charge object" » "coder coder using charge objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using large object" (Expand search), "coder coder using charge project" (Expand search), "coder coder using charged object" (Expand search), "coder decoder using charge object" (Expand search), "code code using charge object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using charge object" (Expand search), "coder coders using charge object" (Expand search), "coder cover using charge object" (Expand search), "coder code using charge object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using charge object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using charge object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using charge object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using charge object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.