Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using buffer objects" » "coder coder using buffer effects" (Expand search), "coder coder in buffer objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using baker objects" (Expand search), "coder coder gain buffer objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using buffer objects" (Expand search), "code code using buffer objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using buffer objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using buffer objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using buffer objects" (Expand search), "coder code using buffer objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using buffer objects") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using buffer objects\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using buffer objects ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using buffer objects") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.