Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using blind parallel" » "coder coder using in parallel" (Expand search), "coder coder using and parallel" (Expand search), "coder decoder using blind parallel" (Expand search), "code code using blind parallel" (Expand search), "decoder codec using blind parallel" (Expand search), "coder coders using blind parallel" (Expand search), "coder cover using blind parallel" (Expand search), "coder code using blind parallel" (Expand search), "coder coder using blends parallel" (Expand search), "coder coder using blood parallel" (Expand search), "coder coder using band parallel" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using blind parallel") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using blind parallel\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using blind parallel ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using blind parallel") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.