Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using biased processes" » "coder coder using based processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using based process" (Expand search), "coder coder using bed processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using biobased processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using phased processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using basic processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using biased processes" (Expand search), "code code using biased processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using biased processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using biased processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using biased processes" (Expand search), "coder code using biased processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using biased processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using biased processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using biased processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using biased processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.