Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using biased objects" » "coder coder using based object" (Expand search), "coder coder using biased objections" (Expand search), "coder coder using boosted objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using biobased objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using phased objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using basic objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using biased objects" (Expand search), "code code using biased objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using biased objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using biased objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using biased objects" (Expand search), "coder code using biased objects" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using biased objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using biased objects\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using biased objects ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using biased objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.