Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using base object" » "coder decoder using base object" (Expand search), "code code using base object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using base object" (Expand search), "coder coders using base object" (Expand search), "coder cover using base object" (Expand search), "coder code using base object" (Expand search), "coder coder using based object" (Expand search), "coder coder using bare object" (Expand search), "coder coder using same object" (Expand search), "coder coder using biased object" (Expand search), "coder coder using basic object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using base object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using base object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using base object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using base object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.