Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using attention processes" » "coder coder using attentional processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using retention processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using creation processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using attention processes" (Expand search), "code code using attention processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using attention processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using attention processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using attention processes" (Expand search), "coder code using attention processes" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using attention processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using attention processes\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using attention processes ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using attention processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.