Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using an objects" » "coder decoder using an objects" (Expand search), "code code using an objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using an objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using an objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using an objects" (Expand search), "coder code using an objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using an object" (Expand search), "coder coder using on objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using an objects") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using an objects\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using an objects ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using an objects") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.