Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using affine objects" » "coder coder using defined objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using affective objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using infinite objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using fine objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using affinity objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using active objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using affine objects" (Expand search), "code code using affine objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using affine objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using affine objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using affine objects" (Expand search), "coder code using affine objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using affine objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using affine objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using affine objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using affine objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.