Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using activity objects" » "coder coder using activity effects" (Expand search), "coder coder using activity affects" (Expand search), "coder coder using activity aspects" (Expand search), "coder coder fishing activity objects" (Expand search), "coder coder guiding activity objects" (Expand search), "coder coder mining activity objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using activity objects" (Expand search), "code code using activity objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using activity objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using activity objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using activity objects" (Expand search), "coder code using activity objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using activity objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using activity objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using activity objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using activity objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.