Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder user perception processes" » "coder coder user reception processes" (Expand search), "coder coder user creation processes" (Expand search), "coder coder user desorption processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder user perception processes" (Expand search), "code code user perception processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec user perception processes" (Expand search), "coder poder usar perception processes" (Expand search), "coder codes used perception processes" (Expand search), "coder code use perception processes" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder user perception processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder user perception processes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder user perception processes ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder user perception processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.