Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder use integer programming" » "coder coder use linear programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder use integer programming" (Expand search), "code code use integer programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec use integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder the integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder phase integer programming" (Expand search), "coder cover use integer programming" (Expand search), "coder code use integer programming" (Expand search), "coder code reuse integer programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder use integer programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder use integer programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder use integer programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder use integer programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.