Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder uptake efficient programming" » "coder coder uptake efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder uptake fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder uptake element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder uptake efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder coder space efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder the efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder copper uptake efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder water uptake efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder co2 uptake efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder uptake efficient programming" (Expand search), "code code uptake efficient programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec uptake efficient programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder uptake efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder uptake efficient programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder uptake efficient programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder uptake efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.