Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder two logic programming" » "coder decoder two logic programming" (Expand search), "code code two logic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec two logic programming" (Expand search), "coder under two logic programming" (Expand search), "coder over two logic programming" (Expand search), "coder order two logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder two logics programming" (Expand search), "coder coder to logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder two lotic programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder two logic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder two logic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder two logic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder two logic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.