Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder to samples processing" » "coder coder to sample processing" (Expand search), "coder coder to complex processing" (Expand search), "coder coder to samples processed" (Expand search), "coder decoder to samples processing" (Expand search), "code code to samples processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec to samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder two samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder _ samples processing" (Expand search), "coder code to samples processing" (Expand search), "coder codes to samples processing" (Expand search), "coder codec to samples processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder to samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder to samples processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder to samples processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder to samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.