Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder time logical programming" » "coder coder time logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder time physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder time goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder the logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder game logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder time logical programming" (Expand search), "code code time logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec time logical programming" (Expand search), "coder cover time logical programming" (Expand search), "coder modern time logical programming" (Expand search), "coder over time logical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder time logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder time logical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder time logical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder time logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.