Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder through inductive programming" » "coder coder through disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder through objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder through reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder through induction programming" (Expand search), "coder coder through reductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder through productive programming" (Expand search), "coder code through inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder border through inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder powder through inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder through inductive programming" (Expand search), "code code through inductive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec through inductive programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder through inductive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder through inductive programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder through inductive programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder through inductive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.