Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder the predicting processing" » "coder coder the predictive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder the printing processing" (Expand search), "coder coder the predicting progression" (Expand search), "coder coder the predictions processing" (Expand search), "coder coder the prediction processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder the predicting processing" (Expand search), "code code the predicting processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec the predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder code the predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder cover the predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder poder the predicting processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder the predicting processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder the predicting processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder the predicting processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder the predicting processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.