Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder the block effect" » "coder coder the block effects" (Expand search), "coder coder the shock effect" (Expand search), "coder coder the back effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder the block effect" (Expand search), "code code the block effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec the block effect" (Expand search), "coder code the block effect" (Expand search), "coder cover the block effect" (Expand search), "coder poder the block effect" (Expand search), "coder coder the clock effect" (Expand search), "coder coder the blood effect" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder the block effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder the block effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder the block effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.