Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder teaching affected processing" » "coder coder teaching affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching effect processing" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching directed processing" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching effects processing" (Expand search), "coder code teaching affected processing" (Expand search), "coder poder teaching affected processing" (Expand search), "coder model teaching affected processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder teaching affected processing" (Expand search), "code code teaching affected processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec teaching affected processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder teaching affected processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder teaching affected processing ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder teaching affected processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.