Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder talking about objects" » "coder cyber stalking about objects" (Expand search), "coder order taking about objects" (Expand search), "coder under taking about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder thinking about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder talk about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder talking about subjects" (Expand search), "coder coder talking belt objects" (Expand search), "coder coder talking art objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder talking about objects" (Expand search), "code code talking about objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec talking about objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder talking about objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder talking about objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder talking about objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder talking about objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.