Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder structural fragment programming" » "coder coder structural agent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder structural fragment programs" (Expand search), "coder coder structural driven programming" (Expand search), "coder coder structural fragments programming" (Expand search), "coder coder structural treatment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder structural frames programming" (Expand search), "coder poder estructural fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder model structural fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder power structural fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder structural fragment programming" (Expand search), "code code structural fragment programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec structural fragment programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder structural fragment programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder structural fragment programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder structural fragment programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder structural fragment programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.