Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder string with processing" » "coder coder string pitch processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string fish processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string without processing" (Expand search), "coder cordel string with processing" (Expand search), "coder closed string with processing" (Expand search), "coder modelo string with processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder string with processing" (Expand search), "code code string with processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec string with processing" (Expand search), "coder coder strings with processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sharing with processing" (Expand search), "coder coder strips with processing" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder string with processing") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string with processing\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string with processing ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string with processing") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.