Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder string typed programming" » "coder coder string based programming" (Expand search), "coder coder string cpld programming" (Expand search), "coder coder string mixed programming" (Expand search), "coder cordel string typed programming" (Expand search), "coder closed string typed programming" (Expand search), "coder modelo string typed programming" (Expand search), "coder coder strong types programming" (Expand search), "coder coder strongly typed programming" (Expand search), "coder coder ring type programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder string typed programming" (Expand search), "code code string typed programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec string typed programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder string typed programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string typed programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string typed programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string typed programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.