Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder string they propose" » "coder cordel string they propose" (Expand search), "coder closed string they propose" (Expand search), "coder modelo string they propose" (Expand search), "coder coder string the propose" (Expand search), "coder coder string the proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder string to propose" (Expand search), "coder decoder string they propose" (Expand search), "code code string they propose" (Expand search), "decoder codec string they propose" (Expand search), "coder coder string theory propose" (Expand search), "coder coder string tree propose" (Expand search), "coder coder striking the propose" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string they propose\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string they propose ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string they propose") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.